COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Aptos VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

#14

LEFT NETWORK

Aptos

APT · Proof of Stake BFT

TBB NETWORK QUALITY68.90.0% 24h

Finality: 0.9s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 160 TPS

Open Aptos profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.7+0.0% 24h

Finality: 60.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricAptosAPTCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score68.985.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#14#124h TBB Score Move0.00+0.01Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time0.90s · proxyTechnical leader2.00sFinality0.90sTechnical leader60.00sThroughput160.00 TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.21 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.50%Technical leader99.50%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health—82.22%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.0010 APT0.0010 CENTROEfficiency83.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance65.4/100Technical leader43.3/100Reliability Score90.2/100Technical leader90.2/100Technical leaderSecurity86.0/10090.0/100Technical leaderCost57.1/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization68.0/10078.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility70.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

AptosCentronium

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

APT68.9

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

APT#14

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

APT0.00

CENTRO+0.01

Evidence Coverage

APT62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

APT0.90s · proxyTechnical leader

CENTRO2.00s

Finality

APT0.90sTechnical leader

CENTRO60.00s

Throughput

APT160.00 TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

APT—

CENTRO0.21 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

APT99.50%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

APT—

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

Average Fee

APT0.0010 APT

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

APT83.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

APT65.4/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.3/100

Reliability Score

APT90.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100Technical leader

Security

APT86.0/100

CENTRO90.0/100Technical leader

Cost

APT57.1/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

APT68.0/100

CENTRO78.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

APT70.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

APT0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricAptosCentroniumPrice$0.8547251.00 C24h change+1.98%—Market cap$744.08M—24h exchange volume$86.17M$88.25KCirculating supply870.82M APT8.37M CENTRO

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=aptos,centronium