COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Centronium VS Ethereum

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

LEFT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.70.0% 24h

Finality: 61.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

#19

RIGHT NETWORK

Ethereum

ETH · Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY64.10.0% 24h

Finality: 780.0s
Reliability: 99.98%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 18 TPS

Open Ethereum profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricCentroniumCENTROEthereumETHTBB Network Quality Score85.7Technical leader64.1TBB Rank#1#1924h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage100.0% · HighTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateSend Time2.00sTechnical leader780.00s · proxyFinality61.00sTechnical leader780.00sThroughput50.00 TPSTechnical leader18.00 TPSObserved Activity0.47 TPSTechnical leader—Reliability99.50%99.98%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health82.15%Technical leader—Average Fee0.0010 CENTRO0.000600 ETHEfficiency98.0/100Technical leader77.6/100Performance43.2/100Technical leader27.7/100Reliability Score90.2/10099.8/100Technical leaderSecurity90.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderCost99.0/100Technical leader26.1/100Decentralization78.0/10092.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility98.0/100Technical leader58.0/100Useful Work100.0/100Technical leader0.0/100

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

CentroniumEthereum

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

ETH64.1

TBB Rank

CENTRO#1

ETH#19

24h TBB Score Move

CENTRO0.00

ETH0.00

Evidence Coverage

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

ETH62.5% · Moderate

Send Time

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

ETH780.00s · proxy

Finality

CENTRO61.00sTechnical leader

ETH780.00s

Throughput

CENTRO50.00 TPSTechnical leader

ETH18.00 TPS

Observed Activity

CENTRO0.47 TPSTechnical leader

ETH—

Reliability

CENTRO99.50%

ETH99.98%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

CENTRO82.15%Technical leader

ETH—

Average Fee

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

ETH0.000600 ETH

Efficiency

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

ETH77.6/100

Performance

CENTRO43.2/100Technical leader

ETH27.7/100

Reliability Score

CENTRO90.2/100

ETH99.8/100Technical leader

Security

CENTRO90.0/100

ETH98.0/100Technical leader

Cost

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

ETH26.1/100

Decentralization

CENTRO78.0/100

ETH92.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

ETH58.0/100

Useful Work

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

ETH0.0/100

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricCentroniumEthereumPrice1.00 C$2.69K24h change—-1.32%Market cap—$328.31B24h exchange volume$88.22K$10.78BCirculating supply8.37M CENTRO122.08M ETH

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=centronium,ethereum