COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Cosmos Hub VS Ethereum

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

#11

LEFT NETWORK

Cosmos Hub

ATOM · Tendermint BFT Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY70.60.0% 24h

Finality: 7.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 100 TPS

Open Cosmos Hub profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

#19

RIGHT NETWORK

Ethereum

ETH · Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY64.10.0% 24h

Finality: 780.0s
Reliability: 99.98%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 18 TPS

Open Ethereum profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricCosmos HubATOMEthereumETHTBB Network Quality Score70.6Technical leader64.1TBB Rank#11#1924h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time7.00s · proxyTechnical leader780.00s · proxyFinality7.00sTechnical leader780.00sThroughput100.00 TPSTechnical leader18.00 TPSObserved Activity——Reliability99.80%99.98%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health——Average Fee0.0050 ATOM0.000600 ETHEfficiency86.6/100Technical leader77.6/100Performance55.2/100Technical leader27.7/100Reliability Score96.2/10099.8/100Technical leaderSecurity90.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderCost50.3/100Technical leader26.1/100Decentralization82.0/10092.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility76.0/100Technical leader58.0/100Useful Work0.0/100Technical leader0.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

Cosmos HubEthereum

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

ATOM70.6Technical leader

ETH64.1

TBB Rank

ATOM#11

ETH#19

24h TBB Score Move

ATOM0.00

ETH0.00

Evidence Coverage

ATOM62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

ETH62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

ATOM7.00s · proxyTechnical leader

ETH780.00s · proxy

Finality

ATOM7.00sTechnical leader

ETH780.00s

Throughput

ATOM100.00 TPSTechnical leader

ETH18.00 TPS

Observed Activity

ATOM—

ETH—

Reliability

ATOM99.80%

ETH99.98%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

ATOM—

ETH—

Average Fee

ATOM0.0050 ATOM

ETH0.000600 ETH

Efficiency

ATOM86.6/100Technical leader

ETH77.6/100

Performance

ATOM55.2/100Technical leader

ETH27.7/100

Reliability Score

ATOM96.2/100

ETH99.8/100Technical leader

Security

ATOM90.0/100

ETH98.0/100Technical leader

Cost

ATOM50.3/100Technical leader

ETH26.1/100

Decentralization

ATOM82.0/100

ETH92.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

ATOM76.0/100Technical leader

ETH58.0/100

Useful Work

ATOM0.0/100Technical leader

ETH0.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricCosmos HubEthereumPrice$1.82$2.69K24h change-0.27%-1.10%Market cap$971.47M$328.07B24h exchange volume$74.12M$9.93BCirculating supply532.68M ATOM122.08M ETH

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=cosmos,ethereum