COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Ethereum VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

#19

LEFT NETWORK

Ethereum

ETH · Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY64.10.0% 24h

Finality: 780.0s
Reliability: 99.98%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 18 TPS

Open Ethereum profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.70.0% 24h

Finality: 61.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricEthereumETHCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score64.185.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#19#124h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time780.00s · proxy2.00sTechnical leaderFinality780.00s61.00sTechnical leaderThroughput18.00 TPS50.00 TPSTechnical leaderObserved Activity—0.47 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.98%Technical leader99.50%Block Cadence Health—82.15%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.000600 ETH0.0010 CENTROEfficiency77.6/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance27.7/10043.2/100Technical leaderReliability Score99.8/100Technical leader90.2/100Security98.0/100Technical leader90.0/100Cost26.1/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization92.0/100Technical leader78.0/100Accessibility58.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

EthereumCentronium

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

ETH64.1

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

ETH#19

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

ETH0.00

CENTRO0.00

Evidence Coverage

ETH62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

ETH780.00s · proxy

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

ETH780.00s

CENTRO61.00sTechnical leader

Throughput

ETH18.00 TPS

CENTRO50.00 TPSTechnical leader

Observed Activity

ETH—

CENTRO0.47 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

ETH99.98%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%

Block Cadence Health

ETH—

CENTRO82.15%Technical leader

Average Fee

ETH0.000600 ETH

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

ETH77.6/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

ETH27.7/100

CENTRO43.2/100Technical leader

Reliability Score

ETH99.8/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100

Security

ETH98.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.0/100

Cost

ETH26.1/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

ETH92.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO78.0/100

Accessibility

ETH58.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

ETH0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricEthereumCentroniumPrice$2.69K1.00 C24h change-1.32%—Market cap$328.31B—24h exchange volume$10.78B$88.22KCirculating supply122.08M ETH8.37M CENTRO

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=ethereum,centronium