COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

NEAR Protocol VS Ethereum

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

#10

LEFT NETWORK

NEAR Protocol

NEAR · Proof of Stake / Doomslug

TBB NETWORK QUALITY70.70.0% 24h

Finality: 2.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 100 TPS

Open NEAR Protocol profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

#19

RIGHT NETWORK

Ethereum

ETH · Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY64.10.0% 24h

Finality: 780.0s
Reliability: 99.98%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 18 TPS

Open Ethereum profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricNEAR ProtocolNEAREthereumETHTBB Network Quality Score70.7Technical leader64.1TBB Rank#10#1924h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time2.00s · proxyTechnical leader780.00s · proxyFinality2.00sTechnical leader780.00sThroughput100.00 TPSTechnical leader18.00 TPSObserved Activity——Reliability99.80%99.98%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health——Average Fee0.0010 NEAR0.000600 ETHEfficiency85.8/100Technical leader77.6/100Performance59.6/100Technical leader27.7/100Reliability Score96.2/10099.8/100Technical leaderSecurity88.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderCost57.1/100Technical leader26.1/100Decentralization75.0/10092.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility76.0/100Technical leader58.0/100Useful Work0.0/100Technical leader0.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

NEAR ProtocolEthereum

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

NEAR70.7Technical leader

ETH64.1

TBB Rank

NEAR#10

ETH#19

24h TBB Score Move

NEAR0.00

ETH0.00

Evidence Coverage

NEAR62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

ETH62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

NEAR2.00s · proxyTechnical leader

ETH780.00s · proxy

Finality

NEAR2.00sTechnical leader

ETH780.00s

Throughput

NEAR100.00 TPSTechnical leader

ETH18.00 TPS

Observed Activity

NEAR—

ETH—

Reliability

NEAR99.80%

ETH99.98%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

NEAR—

ETH—

Average Fee

NEAR0.0010 NEAR

ETH0.000600 ETH

Efficiency

NEAR85.8/100Technical leader

ETH77.6/100

Performance

NEAR59.6/100Technical leader

ETH27.7/100

Reliability Score

NEAR96.2/100

ETH99.8/100Technical leader

Security

NEAR88.0/100

ETH98.0/100Technical leader

Cost

NEAR57.1/100Technical leader

ETH26.1/100

Decentralization

NEAR75.0/100

ETH92.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

NEAR76.0/100Technical leader

ETH58.0/100

Useful Work

NEAR0.0/100Technical leader

ETH0.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricNEAR ProtocolEthereumPrice$4.92$2.69K24h change-2.19%-1.57%Market cap$6.43B$327.83B24h exchange volume$1.38B$11.37BCirculating supply1.31B NEAR122.08M ETH

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=near,ethereum