COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Polkadot VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

LEFT NETWORK

Polkadot

DOT · Nominated Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY71.20.0% 24h

Finality: 60.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 1.00K TPS

Open Polkadot profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.70.0% 24h

Finality: 61.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricPolkadotDOTCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score71.285.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#8#124h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time60.00s · proxy2.00sTechnical leaderFinality60.00sTechnical leader61.00sThroughput1.00K TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.47 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.80%Technical leader99.50%Block Cadence Health—82.15%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.0100 DOT0.0010 CENTROEfficiency84.4/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance62.8/100Technical leader43.2/100Reliability Score96.2/100Technical leader90.2/100Security92.0/100Technical leader90.0/100Cost47.2/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization85.0/100Technical leader78.0/100Accessibility70.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

PolkadotCentronium

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

DOT71.2

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

DOT#8

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

DOT0.00

CENTRO0.00

Evidence Coverage

DOT62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

DOT60.00s · proxy

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

DOT60.00sTechnical leader

CENTRO61.00s

Throughput

DOT1.00K TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

DOT—

CENTRO0.47 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

DOT99.80%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%

Block Cadence Health

DOT—

CENTRO82.15%Technical leader

Average Fee

DOT0.0100 DOT

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

DOT84.4/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

DOT62.8/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.2/100

Reliability Score

DOT96.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100

Security

DOT92.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.0/100

Cost

DOT47.2/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

DOT85.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO78.0/100

Accessibility

DOT70.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

DOT0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricPolkadotCentroniumPrice$1.231.00 C24h change+3.15%—Market cap$2.10B—24h exchange volume$223.76M$88.22KCirculating supply1.70B DOT8.37M CENTRO

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=polkadot,centronium