COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Polkadot VS Ethereum

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

LEFT NETWORK

Polkadot

DOT · Nominated Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY71.20.0% 24h

Finality: 60.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 1.00K TPS

Open Polkadot profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

#19

RIGHT NETWORK

Ethereum

ETH · Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY64.10.0% 24h

Finality: 780.0s
Reliability: 99.98%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 18 TPS

Open Ethereum profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricPolkadotDOTEthereumETHTBB Network Quality Score71.2Technical leader64.1TBB Rank#8#1924h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time60.00s · proxyTechnical leader780.00s · proxyFinality60.00sTechnical leader780.00sThroughput1.00K TPSTechnical leader18.00 TPSObserved Activity——Reliability99.80%99.98%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health——Average Fee0.0100 DOT0.000600 ETHEfficiency84.4/100Technical leader77.6/100Performance62.8/100Technical leader27.7/100Reliability Score96.2/10099.8/100Technical leaderSecurity92.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderCost47.2/100Technical leader26.1/100Decentralization85.0/10092.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility70.0/100Technical leader58.0/100Useful Work0.0/100Technical leader0.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

PolkadotEthereum

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

DOT71.2Technical leader

ETH64.1

TBB Rank

DOT#8

ETH#19

24h TBB Score Move

DOT0.00

ETH0.00

Evidence Coverage

DOT62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

ETH62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

DOT60.00s · proxyTechnical leader

ETH780.00s · proxy

Finality

DOT60.00sTechnical leader

ETH780.00s

Throughput

DOT1.00K TPSTechnical leader

ETH18.00 TPS

Observed Activity

DOT—

ETH—

Reliability

DOT99.80%

ETH99.98%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

DOT—

ETH—

Average Fee

DOT0.0100 DOT

ETH0.000600 ETH

Efficiency

DOT84.4/100Technical leader

ETH77.6/100

Performance

DOT62.8/100Technical leader

ETH27.7/100

Reliability Score

DOT96.2/100

ETH99.8/100Technical leader

Security

DOT92.0/100

ETH98.0/100Technical leader

Cost

DOT47.2/100Technical leader

ETH26.1/100

Decentralization

DOT85.0/100

ETH92.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

DOT70.0/100Technical leader

ETH58.0/100

Useful Work

DOT0.0/100Technical leader

ETH0.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricPolkadotEthereumPrice$1.23$2.69K24h change+3.10%-1.10%Market cap$2.10B$328.07B24h exchange volume$214.43M$9.93BCirculating supply1.70B DOT122.08M ETH

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=polkadot,ethereum