COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Stellar VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

LEFT NETWORK

Stellar

XLM · Stellar Consensus Protocol

TBB NETWORK QUALITY78.70.0% 24h

Finality: 5.0s
Reliability: 99.99%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 1.00K TPS

Open Stellar profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.70.0% 24h

Finality: 61.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricStellarXLMCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score78.785.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#4#124h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time5.00s · proxy2.00sTechnical leaderFinality5.00sTechnical leader61.00sThroughput1.00K TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.47 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.99%Technical leader99.50%Block Cadence Health—82.15%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.000010 XLM0.0010 CENTROEfficiency94.2/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance71.4/100Technical leader43.2/100Reliability Score100.0/100Technical leader90.2/100Security91.0/100Technical leader90.0/100Cost85.7/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization74.0/10078.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility90.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

StellarCentronium

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

XLM78.7

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

XLM#4

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

XLM0.00

CENTRO0.00

Evidence Coverage

XLM62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

XLM5.00s · proxy

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

XLM5.00sTechnical leader

CENTRO61.00s

Throughput

XLM1.00K TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

XLM—

CENTRO0.47 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

XLM99.99%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%

Block Cadence Health

XLM—

CENTRO82.15%Technical leader

Average Fee

XLM0.000010 XLM

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

XLM94.2/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

XLM71.4/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.2/100

Reliability Score

XLM100.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100

Security

XLM91.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.0/100

Cost

XLM85.7/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

XLM74.0/100

CENTRO78.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

XLM90.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

XLM0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricStellarCentroniumPrice$0.2197721.00 C24h change-1.42%—Market cap$7.69B—24h exchange volume$361.17M$88.22KCirculating supply34.97B XLM8.37M CENTRO

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=stellar,centronium