COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Stellar VS Ethereum

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

LEFT NETWORK

Stellar

XLM · Stellar Consensus Protocol

TBB NETWORK QUALITY78.70.0% 24h

Finality: 5.0s
Reliability: 99.99%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 1.00K TPS

Open Stellar profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

#19

RIGHT NETWORK

Ethereum

ETH · Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY64.10.0% 24h

Finality: 780.0s
Reliability: 99.98%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 18 TPS

Open Ethereum profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricStellarXLMEthereumETHTBB Network Quality Score78.7Technical leader64.1TBB Rank#4#1924h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time5.00s · proxyTechnical leader780.00s · proxyFinality5.00sTechnical leader780.00sThroughput1.00K TPSTechnical leader18.00 TPSObserved Activity——Reliability99.99%Technical leader99.98%Block Cadence Health——Average Fee0.000010 XLM0.000600 ETHEfficiency94.2/100Technical leader77.6/100Performance71.4/100Technical leader27.7/100Reliability Score100.0/100Technical leader99.8/100Security91.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderCost85.7/100Technical leader26.1/100Decentralization74.0/10092.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility90.0/100Technical leader58.0/100Useful Work0.0/100Technical leader0.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

StellarEthereum

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

XLM78.7Technical leader

ETH64.1

TBB Rank

XLM#4

ETH#19

24h TBB Score Move

XLM0.00

ETH0.00

Evidence Coverage

XLM62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

ETH62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

XLM5.00s · proxyTechnical leader

ETH780.00s · proxy

Finality

XLM5.00sTechnical leader

ETH780.00s

Throughput

XLM1.00K TPSTechnical leader

ETH18.00 TPS

Observed Activity

XLM—

ETH—

Reliability

XLM99.99%Technical leader

ETH99.98%

Block Cadence Health

XLM—

ETH—

Average Fee

XLM0.000010 XLM

ETH0.000600 ETH

Efficiency

XLM94.2/100Technical leader

ETH77.6/100

Performance

XLM71.4/100Technical leader

ETH27.7/100

Reliability Score

XLM100.0/100Technical leader

ETH99.8/100

Security

XLM91.0/100

ETH98.0/100Technical leader

Cost

XLM85.7/100Technical leader

ETH26.1/100

Decentralization

XLM74.0/100

ETH92.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

XLM90.0/100Technical leader

ETH58.0/100

Useful Work

XLM0.0/100Technical leader

ETH0.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricStellarEthereumPrice$0.219772$2.69K24h change-1.42%-1.32%Market cap$7.69B$328.31B24h exchange volume$361.17M$10.78BCirculating supply34.97B XLM122.08M ETH

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=stellar,ethereum