COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Tezos VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

#12

LEFT NETWORK

Tezos

XTZ · Liquid Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY70.50.0% 24h

Finality: 30.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 40 TPS

Open Tezos profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.7+0.0% 24h

Finality: 60.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricTezosXTZCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score70.585.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#12#124h TBB Score Move0.00+0.01Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time30.00s · proxy2.00sTechnical leaderFinality30.00sTechnical leader60.00sThroughput40.00 TPS50.00 TPSTechnical leaderObserved Activity—0.21 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.80%Technical leader99.50%Block Cadence Health—82.22%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.000400 XTZ0.0010 CENTROEfficiency90.4/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance44.2/100Technical leader43.3/100Reliability Score96.2/100Technical leader90.2/100Security90.0/100Technical leader90.0/100Technical leaderCost52.8/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization84.0/100Technical leader78.0/100Accessibility84.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

TezosCentronium

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

XTZ70.5

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

XTZ#12

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

XTZ0.00

CENTRO+0.01

Evidence Coverage

XTZ62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

XTZ30.00s · proxy

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

XTZ30.00sTechnical leader

CENTRO60.00s

Throughput

XTZ40.00 TPS

CENTRO50.00 TPSTechnical leader

Observed Activity

XTZ—

CENTRO0.21 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

XTZ99.80%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%

Block Cadence Health

XTZ—

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

Average Fee

XTZ0.000400 XTZ

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

XTZ90.4/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

XTZ44.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.3/100

Reliability Score

XTZ96.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100

Security

XTZ90.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.0/100Technical leader

Cost

XTZ52.8/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

XTZ84.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO78.0/100

Accessibility

XTZ84.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

XTZ0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricTezosCentroniumPrice$0.3288711.00 C24h change-1.69%—Market cap$360.95M—24h exchange volume$8.49M$88.25KCirculating supply1.10B XTZ8.37M CENTRO

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=tezos,centronium