COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Centronium VS Hedera

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

LEFT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.70.0% 24h

Finality: 60.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Hedera

HBAR · Hashgraph ABFT

TBB NETWORK QUALITY80.00.0% 24h

Finality: 3.5s
Reliability: 99.99%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 10.00K TPS

Open Hedera profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricCentroniumCENTROHederaHBARTBB Network Quality Score85.7Technical leader80.0TBB Rank#1#224h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage100.0% · HighTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateSend Time2.00sTechnical leader3.50s · proxyFinality60.00s3.50sTechnical leaderThroughput50.00 TPS10.00K TPSTechnical leaderObserved Activity0.63 TPSTechnical leader—Reliability99.50%99.99%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health82.22%Technical leader—Average Fee0.0010 CENTRO$0.0001Efficiency98.0/100Technical leader94.8/100Performance43.3/10087.7/100Technical leaderReliability Score90.2/100100.0/100Technical leaderSecurity90.0/10096.0/100Technical leaderCost99.0/100Technical leader85.7/100Decentralization78.0/100Technical leader55.0/100Accessibility98.0/100Technical leader88.0/100Useful Work100.0/100Technical leader0.0/100

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

CentroniumHedera

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

HBAR80.0

TBB Rank

CENTRO#1

HBAR#2

24h TBB Score Move

CENTRO0.00

HBAR0.00

Evidence Coverage

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

HBAR62.5% · Moderate

Send Time

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

HBAR3.50s · proxy

Finality

CENTRO60.00s

HBAR3.50sTechnical leader

Throughput

CENTRO50.00 TPS

HBAR10.00K TPSTechnical leader

Observed Activity

CENTRO0.63 TPSTechnical leader

HBAR—

Reliability

CENTRO99.50%

HBAR99.99%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

HBAR—

Average Fee

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

HBAR$0.0001

Efficiency

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

HBAR94.8/100

Performance

CENTRO43.3/100

HBAR87.7/100Technical leader

Reliability Score

CENTRO90.2/100

HBAR100.0/100Technical leader

Security

CENTRO90.0/100

HBAR96.0/100Technical leader

Cost

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

HBAR85.7/100

Decentralization

CENTRO78.0/100Technical leader

HBAR55.0/100

Accessibility

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

HBAR88.0/100

Useful Work

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

HBAR0.0/100

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricCentroniumHederaPrice1.00 C$0.09458024h change—+1.48%Market cap—$4.15B24h exchange volume$88.14K$131.79MCirculating supply8.36M CENTRO43.83B HBAR

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=centronium,hedera