COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Cosmos Hub VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

#11

LEFT NETWORK

Cosmos Hub

ATOM · Tendermint BFT Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY70.60.0% 24h

Finality: 7.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 100 TPS

Open Cosmos Hub profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.70.0% 24h

Finality: 60.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricCosmos HubATOMCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score70.685.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#11#124h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time7.00s · proxy2.00sTechnical leaderFinality7.00sTechnical leader60.00sThroughput100.00 TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.63 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.80%Technical leader99.50%Block Cadence Health—82.22%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.0050 ATOM0.0010 CENTROEfficiency86.6/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance55.2/100Technical leader43.3/100Reliability Score96.2/100Technical leader90.2/100Security90.0/100Technical leader90.0/100Technical leaderCost50.3/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization82.0/100Technical leader78.0/100Accessibility76.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

Cosmos HubCentronium

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

ATOM70.6

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

ATOM#11

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

ATOM0.00

CENTRO0.00

Evidence Coverage

ATOM62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

ATOM7.00s · proxy

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

ATOM7.00sTechnical leader

CENTRO60.00s

Throughput

ATOM100.00 TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

ATOM—

CENTRO0.63 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

ATOM99.80%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%

Block Cadence Health

ATOM—

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

Average Fee

ATOM0.0050 ATOM

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

ATOM86.6/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

ATOM55.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.3/100

Reliability Score

ATOM96.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100

Security

ATOM90.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.0/100Technical leader

Cost

ATOM50.3/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

ATOM82.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO78.0/100

Accessibility

ATOM76.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

ATOM0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricCosmos HubCentroniumPrice$1.831.00 C24h change+2.05%—Market cap$976.15M—24h exchange volume$77.85M$88.14KCirculating supply532.65M ATOM8.36M CENTRO

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=cosmos,centronium