Compare 2.0 compatible
COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Internet Computer VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

#7
LEFT NETWORK

Internet Computer

ICP · Chain Key / Threshold Relay
TBB NETWORK QUALITY73.10.0% 24h
Finality
2.0s
Reliability
99.50%
Evidence
63%
Throughput
5.00K TPS
Open Internet Computer profile →
VSTECHNICAL FIRST
#1
RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation
TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.70.0% 24h
Finality
60.0s
Reliability
99.50%
Evidence
100%
Throughput
50 TPS
Open Centronium profile →
TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricInternet ComputerICPCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score73.185.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#7#124h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time2.00s · proxyTechnical leader2.00sTechnical leaderFinality2.00sTechnical leader60.00sThroughput5.00K TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.63 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.50%Technical leader99.50%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health—82.22%Technical leaderAverage Fee$0.00100.0010 CENTROEfficiency72.6/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance85.1/100Technical leader43.3/100Reliability Score90.2/100Technical leader90.2/100Technical leaderSecurity88.0/10090.0/100Technical leaderCost71.4/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization65.0/10078.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility48.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work30.0/100100.0/100Technical leader
HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

Loading historical observations…
Internet ComputerCentronium
MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

ICP73.1

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

ICP#7

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

ICP0.00

CENTRO0.00

Evidence Coverage

ICP62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

ICP2.00s · proxyTechnical leader

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

ICP2.00sTechnical leader

CENTRO60.00s

Throughput

ICP5.00K TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

ICP—

CENTRO0.63 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

ICP99.50%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

ICP—

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

Average Fee

ICP$0.0010

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

ICP72.6/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

ICP85.1/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.3/100

Reliability Score

ICP90.2/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100Technical leader

Security

ICP88.0/100

CENTRO90.0/100Technical leader

Cost

ICP71.4/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

ICP65.0/100

CENTRO78.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

ICP48.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

ICP30.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

Technical quality versus market context
TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →
MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricInternet ComputerCentroniumPrice$3.211.00 C24h change-0.73%—Market cap$1.79B—24h exchange volume$73.01M$88.14KCirculating supply556.90M ICP8.36M CENTRO
SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=internet-computer,centronium