COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

NEAR Protocol VS Cosmos Hub

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

#10

LEFT NETWORK

NEAR Protocol

NEAR · Proof of Stake / Doomslug

TBB NETWORK QUALITY70.70.0% 24h

Finality: 2.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 100 TPS

Open NEAR Protocol profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

#11

RIGHT NETWORK

Cosmos Hub

ATOM · Tendermint BFT Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY70.60.0% 24h

Finality: 7.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 100 TPS

Open Cosmos Hub profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricNEAR ProtocolNEARCosmos HubATOMTBB Network Quality Score70.7Technical leader70.6TBB Rank#10#1124h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time2.00s · proxyTechnical leader7.00s · proxyFinality2.00sTechnical leader7.00sThroughput100.00 TPSTechnical leader100.00 TPSTechnical leaderObserved Activity——Reliability99.80%Technical leader99.80%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health——Average Fee0.0010 NEAR0.0050 ATOMEfficiency85.8/10086.6/100Technical leaderPerformance59.6/100Technical leader55.2/100Reliability Score96.2/100Technical leader96.2/100Technical leaderSecurity88.0/10090.0/100Technical leaderCost57.1/100Technical leader50.3/100Decentralization75.0/10082.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility76.0/100Technical leader76.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100Technical leader0.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

NEAR ProtocolCosmos Hub

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

NEAR70.7Technical leader

ATOM70.6

TBB Rank

NEAR#10

ATOM#11

24h TBB Score Move

NEAR0.00

ATOM0.00

Evidence Coverage

NEAR62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

ATOM62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

NEAR2.00s · proxyTechnical leader

ATOM7.00s · proxy

Finality

NEAR2.00sTechnical leader

ATOM7.00s

Throughput

NEAR100.00 TPSTechnical leader

ATOM100.00 TPSTechnical leader

Observed Activity

NEAR—

ATOM—

Reliability

NEAR99.80%Technical leader

ATOM99.80%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

NEAR—

ATOM—

Average Fee

NEAR0.0010 NEAR

ATOM0.0050 ATOM

Efficiency

NEAR85.8/100

ATOM86.6/100Technical leader

Performance

NEAR59.6/100Technical leader

ATOM55.2/100

Reliability Score

NEAR96.2/100Technical leader

ATOM96.2/100Technical leader

Security

NEAR88.0/100

ATOM90.0/100Technical leader

Cost

NEAR57.1/100Technical leader

ATOM50.3/100

Decentralization

NEAR75.0/100

ATOM82.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

NEAR76.0/100Technical leader

ATOM76.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

NEAR0.0/100Technical leader

ATOM0.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricNEAR ProtocolCosmos HubPrice$4.94$1.8324h change-1.06%+2.05%Market cap$6.45B$976.15M24h exchange volume$1.43B$77.85MCirculating supply1.31B NEAR532.65M ATOM

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=near,cosmos