Compare 2.0 compatible
COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Solana VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

#17
LEFT NETWORK

Solana

SOL · Proof of Stake + Proof of History
TBB NETWORK QUALITY67.00.0% 24h
Finality
13.0s
Reliability
98.80%
Evidence
63%
Throughput
900 TPS
Open Solana profile →
VSTECHNICAL FIRST
#1
RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation
TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.70.0% 24h
Finality
60.0s
Reliability
99.50%
Evidence
100%
Throughput
50 TPS
Open Centronium profile →
TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricSolanaSOLCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score67.085.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#17#124h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time13.00s · proxy2.00sTechnical leaderFinality13.00sTechnical leader60.00sThroughput900.00 TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.63 TPSTechnical leaderReliability98.80%99.50%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health—82.22%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.000005 SOL0.0010 CENTROEfficiency75.2/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance67.4/100Technical leader43.3/100Reliability Score76.2/10090.2/100Technical leaderSecurity88.0/10090.0/100Technical leaderCost67.1/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization78.0/100Technical leader78.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility55.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader
HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

Loading historical observations…
SolanaCentronium
MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

SOL67.0

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

SOL#17

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

SOL0.00

CENTRO0.00

Evidence Coverage

SOL62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

SOL13.00s · proxy

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

SOL13.00sTechnical leader

CENTRO60.00s

Throughput

SOL900.00 TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

SOL—

CENTRO0.63 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

SOL98.80%

CENTRO99.50%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

SOL—

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

Average Fee

SOL0.000005 SOL

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

SOL75.2/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

SOL67.4/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.3/100

Reliability Score

SOL76.2/100

CENTRO90.2/100Technical leader

Security

SOL88.0/100

CENTRO90.0/100Technical leader

Cost

SOL67.1/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

SOL78.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO78.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

SOL55.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

SOL0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

Technical quality versus market context
TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →
MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricSolanaCentroniumPrice$120.461.00 C24h change+1.30%—Market cap$70.79B—24h exchange volume$5.87B$88.14KCirculating supply587.71M SOL8.36M CENTRO
SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=solana,centronium