COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Stellar VS Algorand

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

LEFT NETWORK

Stellar

XLM · Stellar Consensus Protocol

TBB NETWORK QUALITY78.70.0% 24h

Finality: 5.0s
Reliability: 99.99%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 1.00K TPS

Open Stellar profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Algorand

ALGO · Pure Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY79.80.0% 24h

Finality: 3.0s
Reliability: 99.90%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 10.00K TPS

Open Algorand profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricStellarXLMAlgorandALGOTBB Network Quality Score78.779.8Technical leaderTBB Rank#4#324h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time5.00s · proxy3.00s · proxyTechnical leaderFinality5.00s3.00sTechnical leaderThroughput1.00K TPS10.00K TPSTechnical leaderObserved Activity——Reliability99.99%Technical leader99.90%Block Cadence Health——Average Fee0.000010 XLM0.0010 ALGOEfficiency94.2/100Technical leader93.4/100Performance71.4/10088.2/100Technical leaderReliability Score100.0/100Technical leader98.2/100Security91.0/10092.0/100Technical leaderCost85.7/100Technical leader71.4/100Decentralization74.0/10078.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility90.0/100Technical leader88.0/100Useful Work0.0/100Technical leader0.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

StellarAlgorand

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

XLM78.7

ALGO79.8Technical leader

TBB Rank

XLM#4

ALGO#3

24h TBB Score Move

XLM0.00

ALGO0.00

Evidence Coverage

XLM62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

ALGO62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

XLM5.00s · proxy

ALGO3.00s · proxyTechnical leader

Finality

XLM5.00s

ALGO3.00sTechnical leader

Throughput

XLM1.00K TPS

ALGO10.00K TPSTechnical leader

Observed Activity

XLM—

ALGO—

Reliability

XLM99.99%Technical leader

ALGO99.90%

Block Cadence Health

XLM—

ALGO—

Average Fee

XLM0.000010 XLM

ALGO0.0010 ALGO

Efficiency

XLM94.2/100Technical leader

ALGO93.4/100

Performance

XLM71.4/100

ALGO88.2/100Technical leader

Reliability Score

XLM100.0/100Technical leader

ALGO98.2/100

Security

XLM91.0/100

ALGO92.0/100Technical leader

Cost

XLM85.7/100Technical leader

ALGO71.4/100

Decentralization

XLM74.0/100

ALGO78.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

XLM90.0/100Technical leader

ALGO88.0/100

Useful Work

XLM0.0/100Technical leader

ALGO0.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricStellarAlgorandPrice$0.218443$0.11669824h change-0.77%-0.89%Market cap$7.64B$1.06B24h exchange volume$342.34M$64.20MCirculating supply34.97B XLM9.06B ALGO

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=stellar,algorand