COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

Tezos VS Cosmos Hub

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

#12

LEFT NETWORK

Tezos

XTZ · Liquid Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY70.50.0% 24h

Finality: 30.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 40 TPS

Open Tezos profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

#11

RIGHT NETWORK

Cosmos Hub

ATOM · Tendermint BFT Proof of Stake

TBB NETWORK QUALITY70.60.0% 24h

Finality: 7.0s
Reliability: 99.80%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 100 TPS

Open Cosmos Hub profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricTezosXTZCosmos HubATOMTBB Network Quality Score70.570.6Technical leaderTBB Rank#12#1124h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader62.5% · ModerateTechnical leaderSend Time30.00s · proxy7.00s · proxyTechnical leaderFinality30.00s7.00sTechnical leaderThroughput40.00 TPS100.00 TPSTechnical leaderObserved Activity——Reliability99.80%Technical leader99.80%Technical leaderBlock Cadence Health——Average Fee0.000400 XTZ0.0050 ATOMEfficiency90.4/100Technical leader86.6/100Performance44.2/10055.2/100Technical leaderReliability Score96.2/100Technical leader96.2/100Technical leaderSecurity90.0/100Technical leader90.0/100Technical leaderCost52.8/100Technical leader50.3/100Decentralization84.0/100Technical leader82.0/100Accessibility84.0/100Technical leader76.0/100Useful Work0.0/100Technical leader0.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

TezosCosmos Hub

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

XTZ70.5

ATOM70.6Technical leader

TBB Rank

XTZ#12

ATOM#11

24h TBB Score Move

XTZ0.00

ATOM0.00

Evidence Coverage

XTZ62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

ATOM62.5% · ModerateTechnical leader

Send Time

XTZ30.00s · proxy

ATOM7.00s · proxyTechnical leader

Finality

XTZ30.00s

ATOM7.00sTechnical leader

Throughput

XTZ40.00 TPS

ATOM100.00 TPSTechnical leader

Observed Activity

XTZ—

ATOM—

Reliability

XTZ99.80%Technical leader

ATOM99.80%Technical leader

Block Cadence Health

XTZ—

ATOM—

Average Fee

XTZ0.000400 XTZ

ATOM0.0050 ATOM

Efficiency

XTZ90.4/100Technical leader

ATOM86.6/100

Performance

XTZ44.2/100

ATOM55.2/100Technical leader

Reliability Score

XTZ96.2/100Technical leader

ATOM96.2/100Technical leader

Security

XTZ90.0/100Technical leader

ATOM90.0/100Technical leader

Cost

XTZ52.8/100Technical leader

ATOM50.3/100

Decentralization

XTZ84.0/100Technical leader

ATOM82.0/100

Accessibility

XTZ84.0/100Technical leader

ATOM76.0/100

Useful Work

XTZ0.0/100Technical leader

ATOM0.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricTezosCosmos HubPrice$0.328785$1.8324h change-1.03%+2.05%Market cap$360.74M$976.15M24h exchange volume$8.71M$77.85MCirculating supply1.10B XTZ532.65M ATOM

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=tezos,cosmos