COMPARE 2.1 · LIVE TECHNICAL MATCHUP

XRP Ledger VS Centronium

Technical intelligence comes first. Market context remains a separate reference layer and never changes TBB Network Quality.

Technical History Market

LEFT NETWORK

XRP Ledger

XRP · Federated Byzantine Agreement

TBB NETWORK QUALITY77.30.0% 24h

Finality: 4.0s
Reliability: 99.99%
Evidence: 63%
Throughput: 1.50K TPS

Open XRP Ledger profile →

VSTECHNICAL FIRST

RIGHT NETWORK

Centronium

CENTRO · Proof of Useful Work + Validator Attestation

TBB NETWORK QUALITY85.70.0% 24h

Finality: 60.0s
Reliability: 99.50%
Evidence: 100%
Throughput: 50 TPS

Open Centronium profile →

Technical matrix Trajectory Market context

TECHNICAL

TBB Network / Quality comparison 2.1

Shared methodology, current technical values, 24h score movement, and Evidence Coverage.

MetricXRP LedgerXRPCentroniumCENTROTBB Network Quality Score77.385.7Technical leaderTBB Rank#5#124h TBB Score Move0.000.00Evidence Coverage62.5% · Moderate100.0% · HighTechnical leaderSend Time4.00s · proxy2.00sTechnical leaderFinality4.00sTechnical leader60.00sThroughput1.50K TPSTechnical leader50.00 TPSObserved Activity—0.63 TPSTechnical leaderReliability99.99%Technical leader99.50%Block Cadence Health—82.22%Technical leaderAverage Fee0.000010 XRP0.0010 CENTROEfficiency94.2/10098.0/100Technical leaderPerformance74.8/100Technical leader43.3/100Reliability Score100.0/100Technical leader90.2/100Security90.0/100Technical leader90.0/100Technical leaderCost71.4/10099.0/100Technical leaderDecentralization72.0/10078.0/100Technical leaderAccessibility88.0/10098.0/100Technical leaderUseful Work0.0/100100.0/100Technical leader

HISTORY OVERLAY

Compare trajectories, not just snapshots

Overlay 2–4 networks across the same technical series and time window. Historical market data stays outside this technical chart.

XRP LedgerCentronium

MOBILE COMPARE

Technical comparison cards

TBB Network Quality Score

XRP77.3

CENTRO85.7Technical leader

TBB Rank

XRP#5

CENTRO#1

24h TBB Score Move

XRP0.00

CENTRO0.00

Evidence Coverage

XRP62.5% · Moderate

CENTRO100.0% · HighTechnical leader

Send Time

XRP4.00s · proxy

CENTRO2.00sTechnical leader

Finality

XRP4.00sTechnical leader

CENTRO60.00s

Throughput

XRP1.50K TPSTechnical leader

CENTRO50.00 TPS

Observed Activity

XRP—

CENTRO0.63 TPSTechnical leader

Reliability

XRP99.99%Technical leader

CENTRO99.50%

Block Cadence Health

XRP—

CENTRO82.22%Technical leader

Average Fee

XRP0.000010 XRP

CENTRO0.0010 CENTRO

Efficiency

XRP94.2/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Performance

XRP74.8/100Technical leader

CENTRO43.3/100

Reliability Score

XRP100.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.2/100

Security

XRP90.0/100Technical leader

CENTRO90.0/100Technical leader

Cost

XRP71.4/100

CENTRO99.0/100Technical leader

Decentralization

XRP72.0/100

CENTRO78.0/100Technical leader

Accessibility

XRP88.0/100

CENTRO98.0/100Technical leader

Useful Work

XRP0.0/100

CENTRO100.0/100Technical leader

TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

Network quality is not market popularity.

The technical matrix above measures the network. The market section below provides reference context only, and never changes the TBB score.

How TBB scoring works →

MARKET CONTEXT

Market comparison & context

Reference-only financial market data. These fields do not alter the technical comparison or TBB scoring.

MetricXRP LedgerCentroniumPrice$1.551.00 C24h change-0.37%—Market cap$97.37B—24h exchange volume$5.67B$88.14KCirculating supply62.88B XRP8.36M CENTRO

SHAREABLE COMPARISON

Keep this exact comparison

Use the canonical 2–4 chain URL below. It works without local storage.

/compare/?chains=xrp-ledger,centronium